H.Res. 879 Agreed to in the House Congress

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 80) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska Integrated Activity Plan Record of Decision; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 130) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of L

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 80) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to ''National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska Integrated Activity Plan Record of Decision''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 130) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to ''Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 131) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to ''Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program Record of Decision''; providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 58) denouncing t

  1. Introduced
  2. Committee
  3. Agreed to in House
Sponsor Rep. Foxx, Virginia [R-NC-5] Introduced November 17, 2025 Cosponsors 0 Latest action November 18, 2025

Summary

The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of this resolution yet.

Congress.gov

Roll-call votes

Actions

  1. Nov 18, 2025 Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  2. Nov 18, 2025 On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 217 - 210 (Roll no. 291). (text: CR H4719)
  3. Nov 18, 2025 Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H4735-4736)
  4. Nov 18, 2025 POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - The Chair put the question on agreeing to the resolution and by voice vote, announced the ayes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
  5. Nov 18, 2025 On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 217 - 211 (Roll no. 290).
  6. Nov 18, 2025 Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H4734-4735)
  7. Nov 18, 2025 POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 879, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question, and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Foxx demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
  8. Nov 18, 2025 DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 879.
  9. Nov 18, 2025 Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H4718-4725)
  10. Nov 17, 2025 Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 47.
  11. Nov 17, 2025 The resolution provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 80, H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H. Con. Res. 58, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107, and H.R. 5214 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate on each measure. The resolution also provides for one motion to recommit on H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107, and H.R. 5214, and one motion to commit S.J. Res. 80.
  12. Nov 17, 2025 The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-380, by Ms. Foxx.

Congressional and federal records come from official public sources: the House Clerk, the U.S. Senate, GovInfo and the Library of Congress (bill status), the Federal Register, and the congress-legislators project. They are copied on a schedule and may lag the official record by a few hours; the official sources govern. News and coverage counts are drawn from the 4Conservative index and reflect what the press published, not 4Conservative's views. Nothing here is an endorsement of any candidate, party or position. Terms of use.