H.R. 6048 Passed the House Crime and Law Enforcement

NDO Fairness Act of 2025

To amend title 18, United States Code, to modify delayed notice requirements, and for other purposes.

  1. Introduced
  2. Committee
  3. Passed House
  4. Passed Senate
  5. To President
  6. Became law
Sponsor Rep. Fitzgerald, Scott [R-WI-5] Introduced November 17, 2025 Cosponsors 1 (1 D) Latest action September 14, 2026

Summary

NDO Fairness Act
 
This bill increases the requirements the government must meet to obtain a nondisclosure order (NDO) under the Stored Communications Act (SCA).
The SCA generally prohibits providers of remote computing services or electronic communication services (providers) from disclosing stored electronic communications or records (e.g., emails) or information pertaining to customers or subscribers. However, the SCA authorizes the government seek a warrant, order, or subpoena to compel providers to disclose electronic communications or records or information pertaining to customers or subscribers during an investigation. Providers may notify customers and subscribers of the warrant, order, or subpoena unless the government obtains a court order—an NDO—that delays the notification.
This bill raises the standard the government must meet to obtain (or extend) an NDO. The bill also requires the court, before issuing an NDO, to issue a written determination that the standard was met based on specific and articulable facts, and to review the underlying warrant, order, or subpoena.
The bill requires NDOs to be narrowly tailored. It also limits their duration to 90 days for most investigations, though it permits a duration of up to one year for investigations pertaining to an offense involving child pornography or sexual exploitation of children.
Finally, the bill requires the Department of Justice to report annually on data related to NDOs, including the number of customers or subscribers targeted; applications for orders; orders granted, extended, or denied; and orders targeting members of the media or conduct related to certain protected activities.

Summary by the Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.

Congress.gov

Actions

  1. Sep 14, 2026 Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
  2. Aug 31, 2026 Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  3. Aug 31, 2026 On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5266-5267)
  4. Aug 31, 2026 Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.
  5. Aug 31, 2026 DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 6048.
  6. Aug 31, 2026 Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5266-5268)
  7. Aug 31, 2026 Mr. Fitzgerald moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
  8. Nov 20, 2025 Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
  9. Nov 20, 2025 Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
  10. Nov 18, 2025 Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
  11. Nov 17, 2025 Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
  12. Nov 17, 2025 Introduced in House

Congressional and federal records come from official public sources: the House Clerk, the U.S. Senate, GovInfo and the Library of Congress (bill status), the Federal Register, and the congress-legislators project. They are copied on a schedule and may lag the official record by a few hours; the official sources govern. News and coverage counts are drawn from the 4Conservative index and reflect what the press published, not 4Conservative's views. Nothing here is an endorsement of any candidate, party or position. Terms of use.